Scoring Rubric

Print This Page or Click Here to Download PDF File
 


Danville Schools Education Foundation, Inc.


Reviewer Comment Sheet


 
Grant #_________________ Reviewer Letter ______________ Date ______________




SIGNIFICANCE FOR PROJECT:
Score
Reviewers Score



1. How well does the proposal address a major learning goal?
___Enhance Arts and Humanities
___Enhance Achievement through enrichment
___Link Technology to academic success
1-10
2. How well does the proposal link to the following?
____Common Core ____ Danville Diploma
1-15
3. How well does the proposal address a focus area?
___Impact student learning
___Close the gap in student achievement
___Enhance learning
1-15
4. Do proposal activities address diverse learners?
___language ___cultural ___disability ___low socio-economic level
1-5
5. How many students does it reach?
____1-25 ____26-35 ____36-50 ____51-100 ____100+



QUALITY FOR PROJECT DESIGN:



6. What is the potential for impacting student achievement?
1-10
7. Is the proposal clearly written and logical?
Are project goals realistic?
Does it specify measurable objectives?
Does it clearly describe timeline, procedures and management of the project?
What kind of tools will be used to track or document changes?
1-10



PROJECT BUDGET:



8. What will grant funds be spent on?
What is the cost/outcome relationship?
Is the cost for project activities reasonable and feasible?
Does equipment request directly impact student learning?
Are there matching or in-kind funds?
1-10



EVALUATION OF LONG-TERM IMPACT:



9. Can the project be readily evaluated?
Can we determine the impact on student performance and achievement?
1-10